|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| home - por que - blog - bodybuilding - educação física - treinamento de força - musculosos - imagem corporal - serviços e pessoas - imagens - quem sou eu |
|
Bibliografia sobre Agachamento
PMCID: PMC2213554
PMID: 10842410 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 11493853 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 2957703 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 9629064 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 16227888 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 17934755 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 7846133 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 11411626 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 9794055 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 12435984 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
The effect of lumbar belts on isolated lumbar muscle.
Strength and dynamic capacity.
Reyna JR Jr,
Leggett SH,
Kenney K,
Holmes B,
Mooney V.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of New Mexico.
STUDY DESIGN. This study analyzed the effect of lumbar support belts on
functional performance. OBJECTIVE. To compare lumbar muscle strength and
lifting capacity with and without a lumbar belt. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND
DATA. Industrialized settings have begun to encourage the use of lumbar
support belts for their employees. It is believed that the belts may
decrease the risk of injury and enhance the functional performance of the
individual. METHODS. Twenty-two subjects (average age, 27.5 years) were
tested on four separate days to evaluate the effect of a commercially
available belt on isolated lumbar isometric strength and functional
dynamic lifting capacity. All subjects had no history of low back
problems. The order of testing with and without a belt was randomized for
both conditions. On the first 2 days, subjects performed a seven-angle
isometric lumbar extension strength test, 1 day with and 1 day without a
lumbar belt. On the following 2 days, subjects were tested to evaluate
functional capacity with and without a lumbar belt. The functional
capacity evaluation was performed by progressively lifting weighted
canisters from various levels. Heart rates were monitored to ensure that a
maximum effort was achieved over the different days. RESULTS. T tests
revealed that isometric lumbar strength and functional lifting capacity
was not significantly affected by the belt. CONCLUSION. The use of a
lumbar belt does not enhance isometric lumbar muscle strength or dynamic
lifting capacity.
Publication Types:
PMID: 7709282 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 14636099 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 8287855 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 10877482 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 12580658 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 11782833 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 10831806 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 8851780 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 10732178 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 16195018 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 12045519 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 7741618 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 10817411 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID: PMC1859682
PMID: 10545622 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 11209877 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID: PMC2129168
PMID: 18438227 [PubMed - in process]
PMID: 18270382 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 18076267 [PubMed - in process]
PMID: 17909410 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 17762362 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 17615174 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 17419885 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 17127594 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID: PMC2213554
PMID: 16959907 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 16937987 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 16922195 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 16686571 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 16675081 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 16649892 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID: PMC1323346
PMID: 16195018 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 15903387 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 15903385 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 15855681 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 15748830 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 15734247 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 15690307 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 15513714 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 15362310 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 15275840 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 16195018 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 15574092 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 17934755 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 11560093 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 12580658 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 10188748 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 14636100 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 11194098 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMID: 12423179 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
A preliminary comparison of front and back squat
exercises.
Russell PJ,
Phillips SJ.
Department of Physical Education, University of Maryland, College Park
20742.
The purpose of this study was to compare the knee extensor demands and low
back injury risks of the front and back squat exercises. Highly
strength-trained college-aged males (n = 8), who performed each type of
squat (Load = 75% of front squat one repetition maximum), were filmed (50
fps) from the sagittal view. The body was modeled as a five link system.
Film data were digitized and reduced through Newtonian mechanics to obtain
joint forces and muscle moments. Mean and individual subject data results
were examined. The maximum knee extensor moment comparison indicated similar
knee extensor demands, so either squat exercise could be used to develop
knee extensor strength. Both exercises had similar low back injury risks for
four subjects, but sizable maximum trunk extensor moment and maximum lumbar
compressive and shear force differences existed between the squat types for
the other subjects. The latter data revealed that with the influence of
trunk inclination either exercise had the greatest low back injury risk
(i.e., with greater trunk inclination: greater trunk extensor demands and
lumbar shear forces, but smaller lumbar compressive forces). For these four
subjects low back injury risk was influenced more by trunk inclination than
squat exercise type.
Publication Types:
PMID: 2489844 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]